After clusters are identified, many cytometrists want to use statistical tools to rigorously quantify which clusters(s) in their dataset associate with a particular experimental or clinical variable.
Such analyses are often grouped under the umbrella term
differential discovery analysis and include both
comparing the relative size of clusters between experimental
conditions (differential abundance analysis; DAA) as
well as comparing marker expression patterns of clusters between
experimental conditions (differential expression analysis;
DEA). {tidytof}
provides the
tof_analyze_abundance()
and
tof_analyze_expression()
verbs for differential abundance
and differential expression analyses, respectively.
To demonstrate how to use these verbs, we’ll first download a dataset
originally collected for the development of the CITRUS
algorithm. These data are available in the {HDCytoData}
package, which is available on Bioconductor and can be downloaded with
the following command:
if (!requireNamespace("BiocManager", quietly = TRUE)) {
install.packages("BiocManager")
}
BiocManager::install("HDCytoData")
To load the CITRUS data into our current R session, we can call a
function from the {HDCytoData}
, which will provide it to us
in a format from the {flowCore}
package (called a
“flowSet”). To convert this into a tidy tibble, we can use
{tidytof}
built-in method for converting flowCore objects
into tof_tbl
’s .
citrus_raw <- HDCytoData::Bodenmiller_BCR_XL_flowSet()
citrus_data <-
citrus_raw |>
as_tof_tbl(sep = "_")
Thus, we can see that citrus_data
is a
tof_tbl
with 172791 cells (one in each row) and 39 pieces
of information about each cell (one in each column).
We can also extract some metadata from the raw data and join it with
our single-cell data using some functions from the
tidyverse
:
citrus_metadata <-
tibble(
file_name = as.character(flowCore::pData(citrus_raw)[[1]]),
sample_id = 1:length(file_name),
patient = stringr::str_extract(file_name, "patient[:digit:]"),
stimulation = stringr::str_extract(file_name, "(BCR-XL)|Reference")
) |>
mutate(
stimulation = if_else(stimulation == "Reference", "Basal", stimulation)
)
citrus_metadata |>
head()
#> # A tibble: 6 × 4
#> file_name sample_id patient stimulation
#> <chr> <int> <chr> <chr>
#> 1 PBMC8_30min_patient1_BCR-XL.fcs 1 patient1 BCR-XL
#> 2 PBMC8_30min_patient1_Reference.fcs 2 patient1 Basal
#> 3 PBMC8_30min_patient2_BCR-XL.fcs 3 patient2 BCR-XL
#> 4 PBMC8_30min_patient2_Reference.fcs 4 patient2 Basal
#> 5 PBMC8_30min_patient3_BCR-XL.fcs 5 patient3 BCR-XL
#> 6 PBMC8_30min_patient3_Reference.fcs 6 patient3 Basal
Thus, we now have sample-level information about which patient each sample was collected from and which stimulation condition (“Basal” or “BCR-XL”) each sample was exposed to before data acquisition.
Finally, we can join this metadata with our single-cell
tof_tbl
to obtain the cleaned dataset.
After these data cleaning steps, we now have
citrus_data
, a tof_tbl
containing cells
collected from 8 patients. Specifically, 2 samples were taken from each
patient: one in which the cells’ B-cell receptors were stimulated
(BCR-XL) and one in which they were not (Basal). In
citrus_data
, each cell’s patient of origin is stored in the
patient
column, and each cell’s stimulation condition is
stored in the stimulation
column. In addition, the
population_id
column stores information about cluster
labels that were applied to each cell using a combination of FlowSOM
clustering and manual merging (for details, run
?HDCytoData::Bodenmiller_BCR_XL
in the R console).
tof_analyze_abundance()
We might wonder if there are certain clusters that expand or deplete
within patients between the two stimulation conditions described above -
this is a question that requires differential abundance analysis (DAA).
{tidytof}
’s tof_analyze_abundance()
verb
supports the use of 3 statistical approaches for performing DAA:
diffcyt, generalized-linear mixed modeling (GLMMs), and simple t-tests.
Because the setup described above uses a paired design and only has 2
experimental conditions of interest (Basal vs. BCR-XL), we can use the
paired t-test method:
daa_result <-
citrus_data |>
tof_analyze_abundance(
cluster_col = population_id,
effect_col = stimulation,
group_cols = patient,
test_type = "paired",
method = "ttest"
)
daa_result
#> # A tibble: 8 × 8
#> population_id p_val p_adj significant t df mean_diff mean_fc
#> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 1 0.000924 0.00535 "*" -5.48 7 -0.00743 0.644
#> 2 2 0.00623 0.0166 "*" -3.86 7 -0.0156 0.674
#> 3 3 0.0235 0.0314 "*" -2.88 7 -0.0638 0.849
#> 4 4 0.0235 0.0314 "*" 2.88 7 0.0832 1.38
#> 5 5 0.0116 0.0232 "*" 3.39 7 0.00246 1.08
#> 6 6 0.371 0.371 "" -0.955 7 -0.0168 0.919
#> 7 7 0.00134 0.00535 "*" 5.14 7 0.0202 1.14
#> 8 8 0.236 0.270 "" -1.30 7 -0.00228 0.901
Based on this output, we can see that 6 of our 8 clusters have
statistically different abundance in our two stimulation conditions.
Using {tidytof}
easy integration with
{tidyverse}
packages, we can use this result to visualize
the fold-changes of each cluster (within each patient) in the BCR-XL
condition compared to the Basal condition using
{ggplot2}
:
plot_data <-
citrus_data |>
mutate(population_id = as.character(population_id)) |>
left_join(
select(daa_result, population_id, significant, mean_fc),
by = "population_id"
) |>
dplyr::count(patient, stimulation, population_id, significant, mean_fc, name = "n") |>
group_by(patient, stimulation) |>
mutate(prop = n / sum(n)) |>
ungroup() |>
pivot_wider(
names_from = stimulation,
values_from = c(prop, n),
) |>
mutate(
diff = `prop_BCR-XL` - prop_Basal,
fc = `prop_BCR-XL` / prop_Basal,
population_id = fct_reorder(population_id, diff),
direction =
case_when(
mean_fc > 1 & significant == "*" ~ "increase",
mean_fc < 1 & significant == "*" ~ "decrease",
TRUE ~ NA_character_
)
)
significance_data <-
plot_data |>
group_by(population_id, significant, direction) |>
summarize(diff = max(diff), fc = max(fc)) |>
ungroup()
plot_data |>
ggplot(aes(x = population_id, y = fc, fill = direction)) +
geom_violin(trim = FALSE) +
geom_hline(yintercept = 1, color = "red", linetype = "dotted", size = 0.5) +
geom_point() +
geom_text(
aes(x = population_id, y = fc, label = significant),
data = significance_data,
size = 8,
nudge_x = 0.2,
nudge_y = 0.06
) +
scale_x_discrete(labels = function(x) str_c("cluster ", x)) +
scale_fill_manual(
values = c("decrease" = "#cd5241", "increase" = "#207394"),
na.translate = FALSE
) +
labs(
x = NULL,
y = "Abundance fold-change (stimulated / basal)",
fill = "Effect",
caption = "Asterisks indicate significance at an adjusted p-value of 0.05"
)
#> Warning: Using `size` aesthetic for lines was deprecated in ggplot2 3.4.0.
#> ℹ Please use `linewidth` instead.
#> This warning is displayed once every 8 hours.
#> Call `lifecycle::last_lifecycle_warnings()` to see where this warning was
#> generated.
Importantly, the output of tof_analyze_abundance
depends
slightly on the underlying statistical method being used, and details
can be found in the documentation for each
tof_analyze_abundance_*
function family member:
tof_analyze_abundance_diffcyt
tof_analyze_abundance_glmm
tof_analyze_abundance_ttest
tof_analyze_expression()
Similarly, suppose we’re interested in how intracellular signaling
proteins change their expression levels between our two stimulation
conditions in each of our clusters. This is a Differential Expression
Analysis (DEA) and can be performed using {tidytof}
’s
tof_analyze_expression
verb. As above, we can use paired
t-tests with multiple-hypothesis correction to to test for significant
differences in each cluster’s expression of our signaling markers
between stimulation conditions.
signaling_markers <-
c(
"pNFkB_Nd142", "pStat5_Nd150", "pAkt_Sm152", "pStat1_Eu153", "pStat3_Gd158",
"pSlp76_Dy164", "pBtk_Er166", "pErk_Er168", "pS6_Yb172", "pZap70_Gd156"
)
dea_result <-
citrus_data |>
tof_preprocess(channel_cols = any_of(signaling_markers)) |>
tof_analyze_expression(
method = "ttest",
cluster_col = population_id,
marker_cols = any_of(signaling_markers),
effect_col = stimulation,
group_cols = patient,
test_type = "paired"
)
dea_result |>
head()
#> # A tibble: 6 × 9
#> population_id marker p_val p_adj significant t df mean_diff mean_fc
#> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <chr> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 1 pS6_Y… 7.58e-8 2.12e-6 * 22.9 7 2.56 4.31
#> 2 2 pS6_Y… 1.16e-7 2.12e-6 * 21.6 7 2.13 2.49
#> 3 3 pBtk_… 1.32e-7 2.12e-6 * -21.2 7 -0.475 0.289
#> 4 7 pBtk_… 1.18e-7 2.12e-6 * -21.5 7 -0.518 0.286
#> 5 8 pBtk_… 1.30e-7 2.12e-6 * -21.2 7 -0.516 0.324
#> 6 4 pBtk_… 7.85e-7 1.05e-5 * -16.3 7 -0.462 0.296
While the output of tof_analyze_expression()
also
depends on the underlying test being used, we can see that the result
above looks relatively similar to the output from
tof_analyze_abundance()
. Above, the output is a tibble in
which each row represents the differential expression results from a
single cluster-marker pair - for example, the first row represents the
difference in expression of pS6 in cluster 1 between the BCR-XL and
Basal conditions. Each row includes the raw p-value and
multiple-hypothesis-corrected p-value for each cluster-marker pair.
This result can be used to make a volcano plot to visualize the results for all cluster-marker pairs:
volcano_data <-
dea_result |>
mutate(
log2_fc = log(mean_fc, base = 2),
log_p = -log(p_adj),
significance =
case_when(
p_adj < 0.05 & mean_fc > 1 ~ "increased",
p_adj < 0.05 & mean_fc < 1 ~ "decreased",
TRUE ~ NA_character_
),
marker =
str_extract(marker, ".+_") |>
str_remove("_"),
pair = str_c(marker, str_c("cluster ", population_id), sep = "@")
)
volcano_data |>
ggplot(aes(x = log2_fc, y = log_p, fill = significance)) +
geom_vline(xintercept = 0, linetype = "dashed", color = "gray50") +
geom_hline(yintercept = -log(0.05), linetype = "dashed", color = "red") +
geom_point(shape = 21, size = 2) +
ggrepel::geom_text_repel(
aes(label = pair),
data = slice_head(volcano_data, n = 10L),
size = 2
) +
scale_fill_manual(
values = c("decreased" = "#cd5241", "increased" = "#207394"),
na.value = "#cdcdcd"
) +
labs(
x = "log2(Fold-change)",
y = "-log10(p-value)",
fill = NULL,
caption = "Labels indicate the 10 most significant marker-cluster pairs"
)
As above, details can be found in the documentation for each
tof_analyze_expression_*
function family member:
tof_analyze_expression_diffcyt
tof_analyze_expression_lmm
tof_analyze_expression_ttest
sessionInfo()
#> R version 4.4.2 (2024-10-31)
#> Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
#> Running under: Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
#>
#> Matrix products: default
#> BLAS: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/libblas.so.3
#> LAPACK: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/libopenblasp-r0.3.26.so; LAPACK version 3.12.0
#>
#> locale:
#> [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C
#> [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=C
#> [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
#> [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C
#> [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
#> [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
#>
#> time zone: Etc/UTC
#> tzcode source: system (glibc)
#>
#> attached base packages:
#> [1] stats4 stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods
#> [8] base
#>
#> other attached packages:
#> [1] tidyr_1.3.1 stringr_1.5.1
#> [3] HDCytoData_1.26.0 flowCore_2.19.0
#> [5] SummarizedExperiment_1.37.0 Biobase_2.67.0
#> [7] GenomicRanges_1.59.0 GenomeInfoDb_1.43.0
#> [9] IRanges_2.41.1 S4Vectors_0.45.2
#> [11] MatrixGenerics_1.19.0 matrixStats_1.4.1
#> [13] ExperimentHub_2.15.0 AnnotationHub_3.15.0
#> [15] BiocFileCache_2.15.0 dbplyr_2.5.0
#> [17] BiocGenerics_0.53.3 generics_0.1.3
#> [19] forcats_1.0.0 ggplot2_3.5.1
#> [21] dplyr_1.1.4 tidytof_1.1.0
#> [23] rmarkdown_2.29
#>
#> loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
#> [1] sys_3.4.3 jsonlite_1.8.9 shape_1.4.6.1
#> [4] magrittr_2.0.3 farver_2.1.2 zlibbioc_1.52.0
#> [7] vctrs_0.6.5 memoise_2.0.1 htmltools_0.5.8.1
#> [10] S4Arrays_1.7.1 curl_6.0.1 SparseArray_1.7.2
#> [13] sass_0.4.9 parallelly_1.39.0 bslib_0.8.0
#> [16] lubridate_1.9.3 cachem_1.1.0 buildtools_1.0.0
#> [19] igraph_2.1.1 mime_0.12 lifecycle_1.0.4
#> [22] iterators_1.0.14 pkgconfig_2.0.3 Matrix_1.7-1
#> [25] R6_2.5.1 fastmap_1.2.0 GenomeInfoDbData_1.2.13
#> [28] future_1.34.0 digest_0.6.37 colorspace_2.1-1
#> [31] AnnotationDbi_1.69.0 RSQLite_2.3.7 labeling_0.4.3
#> [34] filelock_1.0.3 cytolib_2.19.0 fansi_1.0.6
#> [37] yardstick_1.3.1 timechange_0.3.0 httr_1.4.7
#> [40] polyclip_1.10-7 abind_1.4-8 compiler_4.4.2
#> [43] bit64_4.5.2 withr_3.0.2 doParallel_1.0.17
#> [46] viridis_0.6.5 DBI_1.2.3 ggforce_0.4.2
#> [49] MASS_7.3-61 lava_1.8.0 rappdirs_0.3.3
#> [52] DelayedArray_0.33.2 tools_4.4.2 future.apply_1.11.3
#> [55] nnet_7.3-19 glue_1.8.0 grid_4.4.2
#> [58] recipes_1.1.0 gtable_0.3.6 tzdb_0.4.0
#> [61] class_7.3-22 data.table_1.16.2 hms_1.1.3
#> [64] tidygraph_1.3.1 utf8_1.2.4 XVector_0.47.0
#> [67] ggrepel_0.9.6 BiocVersion_3.21.1 foreach_1.5.2
#> [70] pillar_1.9.0 RcppHNSW_0.6.0 splines_4.4.2
#> [73] tweenr_2.0.3 lattice_0.22-6 survival_3.7-0
#> [76] bit_4.5.0 RProtoBufLib_2.19.0 tidyselect_1.2.1
#> [79] Biostrings_2.75.1 maketools_1.3.1 knitr_1.49
#> [82] gridExtra_2.3 xfun_0.49 graphlayouts_1.2.0
#> [85] hardhat_1.4.0 timeDate_4041.110 stringi_1.8.4
#> [88] UCSC.utils_1.3.0 yaml_2.3.10 evaluate_1.0.1
#> [91] codetools_0.2-20 ggraph_2.2.1 tibble_3.2.1
#> [94] BiocManager_1.30.25 cli_3.6.3 rpart_4.1.23
#> [97] munsell_0.5.1 jquerylib_0.1.4 Rcpp_1.0.13-1
#> [100] globals_0.16.3 png_0.1-8 parallel_4.4.2
#> [103] gower_1.0.1 readr_2.1.5 blob_1.2.4
#> [106] listenv_0.9.1 glmnet_4.1-8 viridisLite_0.4.2
#> [109] ipred_0.9-15 ggridges_0.5.6 scales_1.3.0
#> [112] prodlim_2024.06.25 purrr_1.0.2 crayon_1.5.3
#> [115] rlang_1.1.4 KEGGREST_1.47.0