PANORAMIC tutorial

Introduction

PANORAMIC is designed for multi-sample spatial colocalization analysis. It estimates sample-level spatial effects, then pools them with multilevel meta-analysis to test group-level differences.

Compared with single-sample analyses, PANORAMIC gives you:

  • uncertainty-aware pooling across samples
  • explicit between-sample / between-patient heterogeneity modeling
  • direct two-group contrasts (beta_diff, p_diff, fdr_diff)
  • consistent table and plotting utilities for downstream interpretation

This vignette focuses on practical usage:

  1. Build a toy multi-sample dataset.
  2. Run PANORAMIC stepwise (prepare -> spatial stats -> pooling).
  3. Run the one-call workflow helper (panoramic_analyze()).
  4. Interpret outputs and generate publication-style plots.

Installation

if (!requireNamespace("BiocManager", quietly = TRUE)) {
  install.packages("BiocManager")
}
BiocManager::install("panoramic")

Load packages

library(panoramic)
library(SummarizedExperiment)
library(BiocParallel)
library(dplyr)
library(ggplot2)

Workflow At A Glance

Step Function Primary output Why it matters
1 panoramic_prepare() list of prepared SpatialExperiments with cached spatial objects standardizes per-sample inputs
2 panoramic_spatialstats() SummarizedExperiment with sample-level yi / vi quantifies within-sample spatial effects
3 panoramic_meta_mv() pooled multilevel results + differential contrasts tests group-level biology
Convenience panoramic_analyze() list with prep, stats, pooled, tables one-call reproducible pipeline

Simulate Example Data

We simulate two groups of samples with different spatial structure:

  • group1: mostly random cell mixing
  • group2: stronger local colocalization for early cell types
set.seed(123)
toy <- panoramic_simulate_dataset(
  n_group1 = 3,
  n_group2 = 3,
  n_cells_group1 = 200,
  n_cells_group2 = 350,
  group_labels = c("group1", "group2"),
  scenario_group1 = "random",
  scenario_group2 = "colocalized",
  seed = 123
)

spe_list <- toy$spe_list
design <- toy$design
design
#>     sample  group
#> 1 sample_1 group1
#> 2 sample_2 group1
#> 3 sample_3 group1
#> 4 sample_4 group2
#> 5 sample_5 group2
#> 6 sample_6 group2

Quick geometric sanity check:

plot_df <- do.call(rbind, lapply(spe_list, function(spe) {
  coords <- SpatialExperiment::spatialCoords(spe)
  data.frame(
    x = coords[, 1],
    y = coords[, 2],
    cell_type = SummarizedExperiment::colData(spe)$cell_type,
    sample_id = SummarizedExperiment::colData(spe)$sample_id,
    stringsAsFactors = FALSE
  )
}))

ggplot(plot_df, aes(x = x, y = y, color = cell_type)) +
  geom_point(size = 0.7, alpha = 0.7) +
  facet_wrap(~ sample_id, nrow = 2) +
  coord_equal() +
  theme_bw() +
  labs(x = "x", y = "y", color = "Cell type")

Step 1: Prepare Samples

prep <- panoramic_prepare(
  spe_list = spe_list,
  design = design,
  cell_type = "cell_type",
  min_cells = 5,
  window = "concave"
)
names(S4Vectors::metadata(prep[[1]])$panoramic)
#> [1] "sample_id"    "group_id"     "ppp"          "ppp_rescaled" "marks_tab"   
#> [6] "results"

Step 2: Compute Sample-Level Spatial Effects

Default PANORAMIC statistic is stat = "local_comp_enrichment" (percentage-point enrichment vs local null expectation).

radii_um <- c(25)

se <- panoramic_spatialstats(
  prep = prep,
  radii_um = radii_um,
  stat = "local_comp_enrichment",
  nsim = 30,
  seed = 123,
  BPPARAM = BiocParallel::SerialParam()
)
dim(se)
#> [1] 9 6
head(as.data.frame(rowData(se))[, c("ct1", "ct2", "radius_um", "stat")])
#>        ct1 ct2 radius_um                  stat
#> A|A|25   A   A        25 local_comp_enrichment
#> B|A|25   B   A        25 local_comp_enrichment
#> C|A|25   C   A        25 local_comp_enrichment
#> A|B|25   A   B        25 local_comp_enrichment
#> B|B|25   B   B        25 local_comp_enrichment
#> C|B|25   C   B        25 local_comp_enrichment

Step 3: Pool Across Samples And Test Group Differences

panoramic_meta_mv() pools sample-level effects and computes differential contrasts between groups.

# Here patient_col and sample_col are both "sample" in toy data.
# In real data, patient_col can differ from sample_col (e.g., multiple cores per patient).

se_meta <- panoramic_meta_mv(
  se,
  patient_col = "sample",
  group_col = "group",
  sample_col = "sample",
  tau_structure = "patient",
  method = "REML",
  group_tau2 = "separate"
)

Interpret Pooled And Differential Outputs

Each row in rowData(se_meta) is one feature (ct1, ct2, radius_um) with pooled effects and contrasts.

For differential terms:

  • positive beta_diff: stronger spatial effect in group2 vs group1
  • negative beta_diff: weaker spatial effect in group2
  • small fdr_diff: stronger evidence after multiplicity correction
res <- panoramic_extract_contrast(se_meta)
head(res[, c("ct1", "ct2", "radius_um", "beta_diff", "p_diff", "fdr_diff")])
#>   ct1 ct2 radius_um beta_diff       p_diff     fdr_diff
#> 1   A   A        25 13.391806 1.573627e-08 1.770330e-08
#> 2   B   A        25 16.041489 6.345445e-33 1.903633e-32
#> 3   C   A        25 10.024023 9.532915e-17 1.429937e-16
#> 4   A   B        25 12.561117 8.692835e-27 1.955888e-26
#> 5   B   B        25 12.063309 3.128665e-11 4.022569e-11
#> 6   C   B        25  4.358954 1.289360e-04 1.289360e-04
res %>% dplyr::filter(fdr_diff < 0.05)
#>   ct1 ct2 radius_um  beta_diff   se_diff     z_diff       p_diff     fdr_diff
#> 1   A   A        25  13.391806 2.3688322   5.653337 1.573627e-08 1.770330e-08
#> 2   B   A        25  16.041489 1.3421701  11.951904 6.345445e-33 1.903633e-32
#> 3   C   A        25  10.024023 1.2061931   8.310463 9.532915e-17 1.429937e-16
#> 4   A   B        25  12.561117 1.1723361  10.714604 8.692835e-27 1.955888e-26
#> 5   B   B        25  12.063309 1.8166583   6.640384 3.128665e-11 4.022569e-11
#> 6   C   B        25   4.358954 1.1385594   3.828482 1.289360e-04 1.289360e-04
#> 7   A   C        25  -9.985628 0.7964820 -12.537167 4.674070e-36 2.103331e-35
#> 8   B   C        25 -12.315517 0.7476812 -16.471615 5.868212e-61 5.281391e-60
#> 9   C   C        25  -8.878639 0.9323306  -9.523058 1.681561e-21 3.026810e-21
#>   coloc_source coloc_target coloc_direction
#> 1            A            A          A -> A
#> 2            A            B          A -> B
#> 3            A            C          A -> C
#> 4            B            A          B -> A
#> 5            B            B          B -> B
#> 6            B            C          B -> C
#> 7            C            A          C -> A
#> 8            C            B          C -> B
#> 9            C            C          C -> C

One-Call Workflow (panoramic_analyze)

Use panoramic_analyze() when you want a single reproducible entry point for end-to-end runs.

out <- panoramic_analyze(
  spe_list = spe_list,
  design = design,
  cell_type = "cell_type",
  radii_um = radii_um,
  nsim = 20,
  min_cells = 5,
  window = "concave",
  BPPARAM = BiocParallel::SerialParam()
)
names(out)
#> [1] "prep"   "stats"  "pooled" "tables"
names(out$tables)
#> [1] "spatialstats" "meta"         "contrast"

Visualization Tools

Forest Plot (Feature-Level)

plot_forest(
  se_meta,
  ct1 = "A",
  ct2 = "B",
  radius_um = 25,
  group_col = "group"
)

Volcano Plot (Global Differential Overview)

plot_volcano(se_meta)

Network Summary

net <- create_spatial_network(
  se_meta,
  fdr_threshold = 0.2,
  directed = FALSE,
  leiden_resolution = 1.0
)
plot_spatial_network(
  se_meta,
  fdr_threshold = 0.2,
  directed = FALSE,
  layout = "fr",
  node_size_by = "degree"
)

Practical Notes

  • Start with local_comp_enrichment unless you have a specific reason to use L/K-function alternatives.
  • Use at least two biological samples per group for stable contrasts.
  • Increase nsim for final analyses (the vignette uses modest values for speed).
  • Keep sample metadata (sample, group, patient) explicit and consistent early in your workflow.