We guide you through the individual steps of the BEclear
package in their own chapters. They will follow in the logical order of
an example of correcting some batch affected DNA methylation data. This
article should only give a small tutorial, more details about the
individual methods can always be found in the help sections of the
BEclear
package, e.g. through typing calcBatchEffects
in the R
environment with the package loaded. To work with the methods contained
in the BEclear package, a matrix or data.frame with genes as row-names
and samples as column names as well as a samples data.frame with the
first column named “sample_id” and the second column named “batch_id” is
needed as input.
BEclear is available on Bioconductor. To install it you can therefore use the BiocManager:
if (!requireNamespace("BiocManager", quietly = TRUE)) {
install.packages("BiocManager")
}
BiocManager::install("BEclear")
Otherwise you can also install BEclear from its Github repository by the following command:
if (!requireNamespace("devtools", quietly = TRUE)) {
install.packages("devtools")
}
devtools::install_github("uds-helms/BEclear")
We however recommend installing it through Bioconductor, as this takes care of installing the dependencies and furthermore you can refer to the release of Bioconductor, when using our package, which enables you to reproduce the exact conditions of your run.
During the compilation of the code, many parts of the software will be automatically tested for correct execution and reproduction of expected results. This is implemented in form of unit tests with the help of the testthat package.
When done with the installation you can simply load the package by typing:
The beta values stored in the ex.data matrix were obtained from level 3 BRCA data from the TCGA portal (Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network et al. 2013). Generally, beta values are calculated by dividing the methylated signal by the sum of the unmethylated and methylated signals from a DNA methylation microrarray. In the level 3 TCGA data, this calculation has already been done. The sample data used here contains averaged beta values of probes that belong to promoter regions of single genes. Another possibility would be to use beta values of single probes, whereby the probe names should then be used instead of the gene names as rownames of the matrix.
You can load our sample data via the following command:
It contains one matrix with the beta values:
s20 | s21 | s22 | s23 | s24 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSM3 | 0.2297873 | 0.2162873 | 0.2071987 | 0.2329269 | 0.2120593 |
ADAM28 | 0.3435064 | 0.4579607 | 0.3749625 | 0.4205235 | 0.3933762 |
ADCK1 | 0.2176142 | 0.2120385 | 0.2130803 | 0.2171312 | 0.2143814 |
AFTPH | 0.0314942 | 0.0306752 | 0.0303586 | 0.0293008 | 0.0236312 |
AKAP7 | 0.1265222 | 0.0898430 | 0.1638099 | 0.1087261 | 0.1150119 |
ANKRD24 | 0.0516417 | 0.0427307 | 0.0371261 | 0.0434301 | 0.0430231 |
ANKRD44 | 0.3431776 | 0.3256014 | 0.2781775 | 0.3132249 | 0.2984070 |
ANKS4B | 0.5712550 | 0.5467739 | 0.5209191 | 0.6075328 | 0.5419098 |
APCDD1 | 0.4861491 | 0.4201033 | 0.4405887 | 0.5275998 | 0.4438821 |
APOBEC3G | 0.3636649 | 0.3301716 | 0.3749334 | 0.3509543 | 0.4406087 |
And one data.frame containing the assignment of samples to batches:
sample_id | batch_id |
---|---|
s20 | b109 |
s21 | b109 |
s22 | b109 |
s23 | b109 |
s24 | b117 |
s25 | b117 |
s26 | b117 |
s27 | b117 |
s28 | b117 |
s29 | b117 |
For the detection of batch effects we calculate the median difference
between the beta values of a gene in a batch and the values of this gene
in all other batches. Furthermore we use a non-parametric
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (ks.test
) to compare the
distribution of the beta value for this gene in the batch and the other
batches.
If one gene in a batch has a p-value determined by the
ks.test
of less or equal 0.01 and a median difference of
greater or equal 0.05 it is considered batch effected.
For the calculation of the batch effects you just use the
calcBatchEffects
function. It calculates both median
difference and p-value. By default we correct the p-values by the false
discovery rate developed by Benjamini and
Hochberg (1995), but you can use all adjustment methods covered
by p.adjust.methods
.
batchEffect <- calcBatchEffects(
data = ex.data, samples = ex.samples,
adjusted = TRUE, method = "fdr"
)
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:51] Transforming matrix to data.table
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:51] Calculate the batch effects for 10 batches
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:52] Adjusting p-values
mdifs <- batchEffect$med
pvals <- batchEffect$pval
To see which genes in which batches are effected you use the
calcSummary
function as follows:
summary <- calcSummary(medians = mdifs, pvalues = pvals)
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:52] Generating a summary table
knitr::kable(head(summary), caption = 'Summary over the batch affected gene-sample combination of the example data set')
gene | batch_id | median | pvalue |
---|---|---|---|
ADAM28 | b136 | 0.2539018 | 0.0003223 |
AKAP7 | b136 | 0.2236255 | 0.0000298 |
ANKRD44 | b136 | 0.2578482 | 0.0024103 |
APCDD1 | b136 | 0.2078392 | 0.0000016 |
AREG | b136 | 0.3659073 | 0.0001033 |
BCL2L14 | b136 | 0.2356189 | 0.0058860 |
Furthermore you can calculate a batch score for a whole batch to determine the severity how it is affected.
score <- calcScore(ex.data, ex.samples, summary, dir = getwd())
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:52] Calculating the scores for 10 batches
knitr::kable(score, caption = 'Batch scores of the example data-set')
batch_id | count05 | count1 | count2 | count3 | count4 | count5 | count6 | count7 | count8 | count9 | BEscore | dixonPval |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | NA |
b117 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | NA |
b120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | NA |
b124 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | NA |
b136 | 10 | 2 | 31 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.752 | 1e-07 |
b142 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | NA |
b155 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | NA |
b72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | NA |
b185 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | NA |
b61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | NA |
For the imputation of missing values we use a slightly modified version of the stochastic gradient descent method described by Koren, Bell, and Volinsky (2009). In this section we will describe our implementation of this method and how to use it.
We assume that our complete data matrix Dij can be described by the effects of a matrix Li, which represents the effect of the features (genes in our case) and a matrix Rj describing the effect of the samples in the following way:
The method can either be run on the complete data set or the data set can be divided into blocks on which the method is applied. This division into blocks allows for parallelisation of the method, which can be useful to speed up the process. We have found that a block-size of 60x60 works well(Akulenko, Merl, and Helms 2016).
The error for each block is calculated in the following way:
We try to minimize the following loss function through a gradient descent:
Where K is the set of tuples (i, j) for which the value is present. λ is the penalty coefficient, which controls how restrictive the selection of variables should be. The default of λ is 1.
Another coefficient γ controls the size of the step by which the two matrices Li and Rj are modified. It is initialized by default with 0.01 and its value changes during the iterations (epochs).
For the first iteration the matrices Li and Rj are filled
with random values generated by the rnorm
function from the
stats package and the initial loss and error matrix are
calculated.
Then for each iteration the following is done:
Li and Rj are modified proportional by γ through the following calculation:
Then the new error matrix and loss are calculated.
If the old loss is smaller than the new one:
Else:
The Li and Rj matrices at the end of the last iteration are then used to impute the missing data. The default number of iterations is 50.
First you have to set the found batch effect values to NAs. You can
do this by using the clearBEgenes
function:
cleared.data <- clearBEgenes(ex.data, ex.samples, summary)
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:52] Removing values with batch effect:
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:52] 510 values ( 5.1 % of the data) set to NA
In case you’re using BEclear not for correcting batch effects, but just for the data imputation, you would have to set the values you want to impute to NA, if they not already are.
For the data imputation you use the imputeMissingData
function:
library(ids)
corrected.data <- imputeMissingData(cleared.data,
rowBlockSize = 60,
colBlockSize = 60, epochs = 50,
outputFormat = "", dir = getwd()
)
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:52] Starting the imputation of missing values.
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:52] This might take a while.
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:52] BEclear imputation is started:
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:52] block size: 60 x 60
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:52] Impute missing data for block 1 of 4
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:52] Impute missing data for block 2 of 4
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:52] Impute missing data for block 3 of 4
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Impute missing data for block 4 of 4
If you set rowBlockSize and colBlockSize to 0 the matrix will not be divided into block and the gradient descent will be applied to the matrix as a whole.
Note that sometimes during the prediction, it can happen that values
beyond the boundaries of beta values are returned, that means values
smaller than zero or greater than one. findWrongValues
simply returns a list of these values, together with the position in the
output matrix, replaceOutsideValues
corrects these by
simply setting the wrong values to zero or one, respectively. Note that
these methods are especially designed for the prediction of beta values
from DNA methylation data, which only take on values between 0 and
1.
corrected.data.valid<-replaceOutsideValues(corrected.data)
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Replacing values below 0 or above 1:
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] 0 values replaced
In this case there were no values to be replaced.
Besides the individual methods BEclear also offers an overall method, which executes all the described previous steps in one call. It also applies some preprocessing to your data set if necessary.
result <- correctBatchEffect(data = ex.data, samples = ex.samples)
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Transforming matrix to data.table
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Calculate the batch effects for 10 batches
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Adjusting p-values
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Generating a summary table
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Calculating the scores for 10 batches
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Removing values with batch effect:
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] 510 values ( 5.1 % of the data) set to NA
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Starting the imputation of missing values.
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] This might take a while.
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] BEclear imputation is started:
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] block size: 60 x 60
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Impute missing data for block 1 of 4
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Impute missing data for block 2 of 4
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Impute missing data for block 3 of 4
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Impute missing data for block 4 of 4
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] Replacing values below 0 or above 1:
#> INFO [2024-10-30 04:19:53] 0 values replaced
Returned is a list containing all results from the executed functions.
For parallelization we use the BiocParellel
package. However by default all methods are executed in serial mode. The
methods CalcBatchEffect
, imputeMissingData
and
correctBatchEffect
support parallelization through there
parameter BPPARAM
, which takes a
BiocParallel::BiocParallelParam
class as an argument.
Type the following to get an overview over the supported evaluation environments:
Additionally BEclear
also includes a method for plotting the batch effects. Let us now use
the makeBoxplot
to compare the distributions of the values
in the different samples before and after the batch effect
correction:
makeBoxplot(ex.data, ex.samples, score,
bySamples = TRUE,
col = "standard", main = "Example data", xlab = "Batch",
ylab = "Beta value", scoreCol = TRUE)
makeBoxplot(corrected.data, ex.samples, score,
bySamples = TRUE,
col = "standard", main = "Corrected example data",
xlab = "Batch", ylab = "Beta value", scoreCol = FALSE)
Here is the output of sessionInfo()
on the system on
which this document was compiled running pandoc 3.2.1:
R version 4.4.1 (2024-06-14)
Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
locale: LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8, LC_NUMERIC=C, LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8, LC_COLLATE=C, LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8, LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8, LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8, LC_NAME=C, LC_ADDRESS=C, LC_TELEPHONE=C, LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 and LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
attached base packages: stats, graphics, grDevices, utils, datasets, methods and base
other attached packages: ids(v.1.0.1), BEclear(v.2.23.0), BiocParallel(v.1.39.0), pander(v.0.6.5) and BiocStyle(v.2.33.1)
loaded via a namespace (and not attached): Matrix(v.1.7-1), jsonlite(v.1.8.9), highr(v.0.11), futile.logger(v.1.4.3), compiler(v.4.4.1), BiocManager(v.1.30.25), Rcpp(v.1.0.13), parallel(v.4.4.1), jquerylib(v.0.1.4), uuid(v.1.2-1), yaml(v.2.3.10), fastmap(v.1.2.0), lattice(v.0.22-6), R6(v.2.5.1), knitr(v.1.48), rbibutils(v.2.3), maketools(v.1.3.1), openssl(v.2.2.2), bslib(v.0.8.0), rlang(v.1.1.4), cachem(v.1.1.0), xfun(v.0.48), sass(v.0.4.9), sys(v.3.4.3), cli(v.3.6.3), formatR(v.1.14), Rdpack(v.2.6.1), futile.options(v.1.0.1), digest(v.0.6.37), grid(v.4.4.1), askpass(v.1.2.1), lifecycle(v.1.0.4), dixonTest(v.1.0.4), evaluate(v.1.0.1), data.table(v.1.16.2), lambda.r(v.1.2.4), codetools(v.0.2-20), buildtools(v.1.0.0), abind(v.1.4-8), rmarkdown(v.2.28), tools(v.4.4.1) and htmltools(v.0.5.8.1)